• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Aicpin
  • Recent Post
  • Pay Matrix
    • Defence Personnel
      • MNS Officers
  • Recent Govt Orders
    • Dopt orders
    • Finmin orders
  • DA From January 2021
  • Holiday list 2020
Govtempdiary

Govtempdiary

Govtempdiary is leading Central government employees news provider

You are here: Home / 8th Pay Commission News / 7th pay commission / 7CPC / Information pertaining to Allowance payable to Officers/Staff of Railways – Para-wise views – addressed to Secretary, 7th CPC
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is b_new.gif Demanded for payment of Dearness Allowance/Dearness Relief with arrears since 01.01.2020
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is b_new.gif AICPIN for the month of December 2020
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is b_new.gif LTC cash voucher scheme Calculator
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is b_new.gif Expected DA from January 2021 Calculator
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is b_new.gif List of Kendriya Vidyalaya Schools 2021

Quick links
Hot newsDopt orders
Recent govt ordersRecent post

Information pertaining to Allowance payable to Officers/Staff of Railways – Para-wise views – addressed to Secretary, 7th CPC

May 3, 2020 rajasinghmurugesan

Information pertaining to Allowance payable to Officers/Staff of Railways – Para-wise views – reg

NFIR
National Federation of Indian Railwaymen
3, Chelmsford Road, New Delhi – 110 055
Affiliated to:
Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC)
International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF)

No.IV/NFIR/7th CPC/Corres/Pt.V

Dated: 15/04/2015

The Secretary,
Seventh Central Pay Commission,
Chhatrapati Shivaji Bhawan,
IIFT, Block B(B-14/A)
Qutub Institutional Area,
New Delhi – 110016

Madam,
Sub: Information pertaining to Allowance payable to Officers/Staff of Railways – Para-wise views – reg.
Ref: Railway Board OM No. E (P&A) 11-2014/Misc.3/7th CPC dated 20.10.2014.

Kindly refer our discussions on the subject of Pay Element and Running Allowances payable to Running Staff during the course of tendering oral evidence before the Hon’ble Chairman, 7th Central Pay Commission on the 14th April, 2015.

We have explained in clear terms that the issues of Pay Element and Running Allowances have been dealt through bilateral negotiations between the Railway Ministry and the Federations’ since the last several decades and hence the 7th CPC need not look into these aspects, although Railway Ministry has sent certain details in this regard.

In this connection, the Federation furnishes below its comments on Railway Board’s OM dated 20/10/2014 for the appreciation of the 7th CPC.

We also invite the kind attention of 7th CPC to the following minutes of the PNM Meeting of NFIR held with the Railway Board on 20th /21st December, 2014.

“NFIR PNM 8/2011: The Staff Side requested to withdraw the reference on Running allowances sent to 7th CPC as the Federation raised certain objections to the contents thereof’.

We therefore request the Hon’ble VII CPC to leave the Pay Element and Running Allowances subject to be dealt by Railway Ministry through discussions with the Federations.

Thanking you,

Yours sincerely
(Dr M. Raghavaiah)
General Secretary

I. A brief on the pay element and the rates of Running Allowance for the running staff on the Indian Railways: ’

Para A 1:

A misleading projection is made out by the Railway Board to say that the competent authority can decide the manner of calculation of the rate of running allowance on the plea that the formula recommended by the Running Allowance Committee (RAC) 1980, which was accepted and implemented and followed since then by the Ministry of Railways, has not been mentioned m Ru’in^n8 Allowance rule 1981, nor mentioned in the Establishment Code/ Manual which is not correct at all. We invite the attention of the Honourable Commission to para 1, 2 & 3 of Running Allowance Rules 1981 published under RB ‘s No. E (P&A) II-80/RS/10 dt 17.07.81, para 3.3, in which it is clearly stated that on the basis of methodology i.e. formula suggested by the RAC 1980 the rates were fixed The Running allowance committee was constituted by the Ministry of Railways and its recommendations, which include the manner in which the rate of running allowance should be calculated i.e. the formula for calculating the rates of running allowance has been accepted by the Ministry after due consultation and agreement with the Federation and acted upon for revision of rate from 1981 onwards by the competent authority in the past. Therefore, the contention of the Railway Board as stated in their O that competent authority can decide the manner of calculation of the rates disregarding the method o calculation enunciated in RAC 1980 formula is not correct. The recommendation and its acceptance ot the formula is a definite guideline that should be followed by the competent authority and any action bereft of such an accepted recommendation is arbitrary.

Para A 2 & 3:

The contention that erosion of depression of pay scales, widening of gap between earnings of running staff vis-a-vis non- running staff after successive pay commissions itself is totally wrong statement and is an invention of the management intended to deprive the Running staff of their legitimate pay scales and emoluments. In fact the 4th and 5th Pay Commissions opined that the formula of RAC 1980 to calculate the rate of running allowances stands good and recommended to continue. The Railway Board should be asked to give sufficient proof to their contention of erosion in depression of pay scale and widening of gap in the earnings of Running staff vis-a-vis non running staff. In t is connection we invite your kind attention to para 10 and 16 of Report of the Committee to Recommend Pay Element and Kilometerage Allowance for the Running Staff, November 2008 (Joint Committee 2008), which denounces the concept of depression factor.
The Joint Committee 2008 recommended double the rate of kilometerage allowance on an assumption that the Government of India would have doubled the rate of Travelling Allowance / Daily Allowance.

This is amply dear from the reading of the report of Join, Committee 2008. We extract the para 14 of the Joint Committee 2008 “ By application of similar methodology w.e.J 1/09/2UM when the rates ofTA/DA are revised, assuming that the rate ofTA/DA for employees in the pay band 9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4200 is fixed at Rs.210 per day “Only on assumption that the TA/DA rate will be doubled, the rate of kilometerage is fixed in 2008. The TA rate prior to> VI CPC was Rs. 105 has been revised to Rs. 340, not to Rs. 210 as assumed by the Joint Committee 2008.

In regard to the averment that though the Recognized Federations were members of the Joint Committee 2008 and a party to the deliberations are clamoring for the revision of rates, it is submitted that when the TA/DA rate increased by three times against the assumption that it will be only doubled, naturally the grievances arose to rectify the mistakes made, that is why the Federation aptly raised the issue to revise the rates of Kilometrage Allowances in DC/JCM and there is nothing abnormal in that.
Hiding behind the argument that staff side were also members of the Joint Committee cannot be a ground not to rectify the mistake.

Para B 1: No Comments- Facts are mentioned.

Para B 2:

In this para it is mentioned that the highest scale of pay admissible to Loco running staff under III CPC is Rs.550-750 but the fact is entirely different. From 1985, 20% of the Mail / Express Driver were allotted the scale of pay of Rs.700-900 on cadre restructuring vide Letter No. PC III/84/UPG/19 dated 25/06/1985 w.e.f 1.1.84 (proforma).

Mail Guard and Mail Driver were allotted with same scale of pay of Rs.5500-9000 by the 5th CPC ignoring the historical relativity but Mail and Express Driver scale of pay was improved to Rs.6000-9800 by the Fast Track Committee appointed by the Government of India.In the previous para A2, the stand of the Railway Board appears that the running allowance scheme has been introduced on the concept that depressed pay scale has been allowed to running stall. But in this para they took a directly opposite version that the basic objective of Running Allowance Rule is an orientation towards better performance etc.

Para B 3:

There was no concept of depressed scale of pay. From a reading of the report of successive pay commissions I CPC to VI CPC, it will be amply clear that the successive pay commissions never said that they recommended a pay scale to Running Staff lower than what they are eligible but for the scheme of running allowance. The running allowance is not to make good for the loss due to depressed nay scales as pleaded by the Railway. In their own words the Railway Board spelt out in para B2 ot the letter under reference, the purpose for the running allowance that read as follows “….. the basic objects of these rules is an orientation towards better performance, simultaneously ensurmg that the running staff are not prevented from earning a reasonable amount of running allowance in a month due to factors not attributable to them” and further as said in para (v) of B1 that “running allowance means an allowance for the performance of duty directly connected with charge of moving trams .

Running Staff Pay and Allowances Committee (RSPAC) 1948

Para 51 states that it appears that body consider that the mode adopted for calculating running allowance offer the simplest and the soundest basis which provides “the requisite incentive to the running staff to exert themselves to the utmost in speeding up movement and discourage dilatory method of work”.

2nd Central Pay Commission :

para 28, “ it is pay as an incentive for the safe and punctual movement of trains and a small portion of it is intended to cover travelling allowance”.

Ashruff Committee (1968):

The only measure of the efficiency of performance is the running allowance, which is co related to the distance worked by the running staff.

3rd Central Pay Commission :

Para 187 “we feel that the status quo in regard to the running allowance be maintained…..at the same time, the essential character of running allowance as an incentive for improved attendance and performance would also retained”.

Running Allowance Committee 1980 :

The terms of reference states that “the broad objective of the running allowance rules is acting as an incentive for over all improved performance”.

4th Central Pay Commission :

Para 10.456, “it has been brought to notice that the practice of including the pay element in the running allowance acts as an incentive to the running staff and should be continued. We are inclined to agree”.

5th Central Pay Commission :

Para 83-159, “ we tend to agree with the opinion expressed by the Ministry and feel that the basic objective of motivating running staff to do maximum running duties is fulfilled by the existing system of payment of running allowance”.

Para B 4, & B 5 : Facts and nothing to contest.

Para B 6: No Comments.

Para B 7:

The statement of Railway Board that the RAC 1980 was the first to assess the quantum of this pay element is not the factual position. From 1919 onwards the quantum of pay element is assessed as 75% but RAC 1980 reduced it to 30% and the pay element for retirement benefit was fixed at 60% in the year 1980. However 75% of pay element was fixed for retirement benefits till 05.12.1988 (ref: Para 10 of Joint Committee 2008). Therefore the averment advanced in this para that the RAC 1980 has first determined the quantum of pay element is totally wrong.

The further chart incorporated in para no. 7 as if it has been drawn in the report of RAC 1980 is also not correct. The RAC 1980 never made such an exercise, as clear from their deliberation in para 710 of its report. This chart and the statement are totally not based on RAC 1980 report but intended to mislead the 7 CPC and the same has to be rejected summarily.

Para B 8:

In this para the Railway Board tried to project that the 3rd CPC could have allowed a pay scale of Rs.840-1040 for Mail Driver instead of Rs.550-750, but for the existence of running allowance.

This is a claim without any ground to advance. A reading of 3rd CPC never gives such an impression that the commission recommended a pay lesser than what is eligible for a Mail Driver on account of existence of the running allowance. The 4th, 5th and 6th CPC reports were also on the same lines. A replacement scale to the existing one has been allotted for all including the running staff. The whole argument is bereft -of any evidence and the concept of measure of depression advanced by Railway Board is totally unfounded and intended to misguide the Honourable Pay Commission.

It is our view that equating the duties of Loco running staff with a non running staff in Railways itself is wrong. The duties, responsibility, nature of arduousness, the long hours of work, unscheduled working time, the highest medical fitness, the sustained attention, no relaxation after taking over charge of train, the knowledge and skill required to perform their duties, the continued absence from family for a long period of life etc are features attached to the post of running staff.

Para B 9:

We are constrained to call the attention of the Honourable Commission to the para 812 to 817 of the RAC 1980. The committee fixed the average kilometre earned by Passenger Driver per month at3950 km after due deliberation. The averment that the RAC 1980 fixed it at 5100 km is totally wrong and misguiding. The Railway Board arbitrarily changed this to 5100 kms in 1987. Even the report of RAC 2002 finds it that the average earning of kilometre in a month for a Passenger Driver is 4700Km. it is our opinion that the average kilometer is to be fixed based on factual study.

Para B 10 :

The averments in this para are misconceived and contrary to the facts. The depression concept advanced by the Railway Board has been dealt with in para B 3, B 7 and B 8 of this representation. We find no para such as 2.6 in this Railway Board letter under reference to Hon’ble Commission. The farther averment that the 4th and 5th CPC over looked this aspect is not a fact. Blaming a higher expert body like Pay Commission that they over looked facts, itself shows the mind-set of the Ministry of Railways. After accepting the recommendation and implementing the reports, blaming the pay commissions is not correct. The 4th and 5th CPC never recommended to review the Running Allowance Rules, due to increase in pay scale of running staff vis-a-vis non running staff. The averment in this regard is wrong and baseless The erosion of depression shown in the chart is not a factual position. Allotted pay scales by CPC is not based on measure of depression and the whole concept advanced by Railway Board should be rejected in its entirety.

Para B 11:

In this para, Railway Board compared the average annual wage of Group C staff and the Running Staff. In this regard, it is observed that unless the duties, responsibilities, working conditions and promotion avenues are comparable, pay scale cannot be compared with the other staff. Running Staff duties involves tour of duties in the whole year, night duties, over time working, breach of rest working etc which entitle allowances such as KMA, Night Duty Allowance, Overtime Allowance, Breach of Rest Allowance etc. The average wage of running staff includes these elements but other Group C Staff do not have such a working and do not have such allowances. Without spelling out the ingredients of emoluments taken, comparison of Running Staff and Group C Staff is incorrect and intended to mislead the commission. The historical horizontal and vertical relativities were considered by the successive Pay Commissions. Hence comparing the annual wage of Running Staff and Group C Staff cannot be accepted. This would lead to a Labyrinth.Further, Railway Board pointed out ratio between Running Staff and Group C staff upto 2004, the following table after the implementation of IV CPC upto 2004 (DA merged as DP) gives the factual position:Year Maximum Basic Pay of Running Staff + DA Rs.(6000-9800) Max. Basic Pay of Group ‘C’ Staff + DA Rs.(7450-11500)

The averment made in this para that the 6th CPC granted higher than normal replacement scale is totally wrong and the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 + Grade Pay of 4200 allowed to the Loco Running Staff is a normal replacement pay structure. The additional allowance allowed by the 6th CPC was on consideration of the onerous nature of duty. The averment of the Railway Board about the widening gap between the emoluments of Running and Non — running Staff is not the factual position.Reckoning of DA that was drawn by the employees’ for fixation of pay in the new pay scale is a natural course authorized, by the successive Pay Commissions.

Para B 12 :

The recommendations by CRA 2002 report submitted in 2005, has been rejected in toto by the Ministry of Railways and so mentioning this is unwarranted.

Para B 13,14 & 15

We agree that the revised pay band of Rs 9300 – 34,800 PB2 is not derived from a single scale but amalgamation of several scales starting from Rs.5000 -8000 to Rs.8000 13,500^ So Rs. 9300 in the Pay band of PB-2 will never be the minimum of Rs.5500 – 9000 of Loco Pilot (Passenger) in 5 CPC scale. On the grounds as given above, taking the minimum of Rs.9300 in pay band is not correct.

Para B 16:

The Picture conveyed by the Railway Board that the Joint Committee, which includes the Federations, observed that there was a need to review the pay element for serving employees as well as for retirement benefits w.e.f 1.1.2006, is completely a false one and far from the truth, intendedto mis-lead the employees.

Para B 17:

The averment in this para is disputed. There was no higher pay scales allowed to running staff than a normal replacement scale ( Pay band +GP). It may be noted that the replacement pay band Rs 9300 – 34 800 + GP Rs.4200 has been allowed for all Central Govt. Employees who were in s. 5000 -8000 and Rs.5500 – 9000. The Loco Pilots were in Rs.5000 – 8000, Rs.5500 – 9000 and Rs.6000-9800 also has been the same replacement pay band of Rs. 9300 – 34,800 plus 4200 GP. T ere is no iota of truth in the averment that higher pay scales than the normal replacement scales were allowed to running staff. It may also be noted that the 4 CPC and 5 CPC also allowed a normal replacement scale for running staff as of others. In 4 CPC Loco Pilots in Rs.550-700, Rs. 550 750 and Rs. 700 -900 were allotted with a scale of Rs. 1600 – 2660, & Rs 1640 – 2900 as given to all other employees in identical scale.

In 5th CPC also only normal replacement scales were allowed to running staff. Loco Pilots or Non Running staff who were in Rs.1640-2900 in 4th CPC were allowed with Rs. 5500-9000 by 5 CPC. The averment in this para is totally wrong and contradicts the factual position as stated above.

Para B 18 :

The Joint Committee 2008 did not reduce the pay element, not wholly on the sentiment of the staff but taking into consideration of the factual position described in our comments on para B 17. 1 he statement made in this para is that “the ratio between average wage of non-running staff vis a – vis average wage of running staff has significantly changed from 1980 – 81 at the stage of 1.00 : 1.16 and 1.00 : 1.69 in 2003-04. With the 6th CPC scales pay having been implemented, this, gap between the running staff and the non-running staff has further widened”, has been countered m our comment to mra B 11. Moreover the 4th, 5th and 6th CPC after taking the whole picture never found such changes in the average wage between running staff and non-running staff. Further due to cadre restructuring exercise many non-running staff gained advantage in their pay packet. Though the minimum and maximum of scales are maintained, the percentage of posts in minimum and maximum scale was largely changed after 3rd CPC. This aspect was not taken by the Railway Board and conveniently suppressed the fact while presenting average annual wage between running and non-running staff. Such being the position, the averment made in this para is unfounded.

Para B 19:

The comments offered for para B 11, B 17 and B 18 gives the real picture.

Para B 20:

The Joint Committee 2008 recommendations were based on the assumption that T.A rates would be doubled, but it is pointed out here that the TA rate for all Central Government Employees including Railway workers has been increased at the tune of 3.4 times from Rs.105 to Rs. 340. Therefore, taking Rs.210 as TA rate instead of the eligible TA rate of Rs.340 for GP 4200 to calculate the rates of running allowance is totally unjustified and hence needs revision. ( PI refer NFIR DC/JCM demand also vide Sub .No. 2/2010)

Para B 21 & Para B 23 :

The contention in these paragraphs are disputed. The Joint Committee 2008 recommended two rates of running allowance, one from 01-01-2006 and other from 01-09-2008 in para 13&14 of its report On the fact that the running allowance contains a pay element, revision in the rate of this allowance requires to be carried out with effect from 01-01-2006 and further from 01-09-2008 when allowance, i.e. the TA rate has been revised.

Para B 22:

The averment in this para has been countered in this representation in various paras above.

Para B 24:

Upward revision of the allowances by 25% when DA crosses 50 % is a recommendation of 6 CPC that was accepted and implemented by the Ministry of Railways based on Federation s demand.

Para B 25 & B 26:

PI. Refer Minutes of NFIR PNM Item 8/2013: Committee to determine the quantum of pay. element in Running Allowance -Withdrawal of Railway Board’s arbitrary decision. Federation desired to include this issue in the Committee formed to deliberate on Running Staff issues where ED (T&MPP) is the Convenor.

Accordingly it was decided to include in the list of items to be dealt by the Committee.

Related posts:

  1. Clarification regarding calculation of quantum of Annual Increment in pay in case of Running Staff
  2. Committee to examine the demand for consideration of Ticket Checking Staff as Running Staff – Railways
  3. Fixation of pay of running staff on promotion in the 6th CPC pay structure – Railways
  4. Revision of the rates of Allowance in lieu of Running room facilities, Shunting Duty Allowance, Trip Allowance and Commercial duty Allowance pay able to the running staff with effect from 1-1-2011.
  5. Grant of Transport Allowance to the Running Staff only taking into account pay plus 30% of pay
  6. Reckoning of 30% pay element for the purpose of payment towards leave encashment upto 10 days to running staff.
  7. Railway Order –  Grant of Additional Allowance to Running Staff : 7th CPC
  8. Payment of Over Time Allowance on the basis of emoluments of 7th CPC Pay  Matrix levels to the staff in Railways
  9. 7th CPC – Revision of the rates of Railway Board Tenure Allowance to the Officers of Organized Group ‘A’ Railway Services
  10. Revision of Kilometrage rates and other Allowances for Running Staff in the wake of implementation of VII CPC pay structure
  11. NFIR – TA/DA, PF, Pass, Medical and accommodation facilities to the contract Para-Medical Staff working in Railways
  12. Empowered Committee to finalize a mechanism for a new formula for running allowance
  13. Merger of Dearness Allowance equal to 50% of basic pay w.e.f. 01/04/2004 —Reckoning as pay for running staff.
  14. 7th CPC – Grant of Additional Allowance to Running Staff
  15. 7th CPC – Risk and Hardship Allowance to P. Way Staff in Railways
  16. NFIR – Grant of PCO Allowance to the staff of production control Organizations on India Railways
  17. NFIR – Salary and Travelling Allowance to retired Railway Staff re-engaged in Railways
  18. Pay element relating to Running Staff
  19. Empowered Committee for Running Allowance in the 7th CPC Pay Structure-reg.
  20. 7th CPC – Rates of Tenure Allowance to officers of Organized Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ Railway Officers (Railway)

Filed Under: 7CPC, 7cpc Interim Report, Age Relaxation, Leave rules for government employees, Pay Rules May 3, 2020 1 Comment

LTC cash voucher scheme 2020
LTC cash voucher scheme 2020

PCDA Circular : Implementation of recommendation of 7th CPC – Grant of Non-Functional Up gradation (NFU)

February 23, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

PCDA Circular : Implementation of recommendation of 7th CPC – Grant of Non-Functional Up gradation (NFU) IMPORTANT CIRCULAR (Through PCDA (WC) Website) No. AN/III/1874/NFU Dated: – 17.02.2021 To, 1.All Sub Offices and IFAs (under PCDA (WC) Chd.) 2. All Sections (Main Office, PCDA (WC) Chd.) Subject: Implementation of recommendation of 7th CPC- Para 11.12.140- Grant […]

Kolkata (Phase -III) Housing Scheme

February 21, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Kolkata (Phase -III) Housing Scheme CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION(An Autonomous body of Govt. of India, under the aegis of M/o Housing & Urban Affairs)6th floor, `A’ Wing, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath, New Delhi-110001Ph: 011-23717249, 23739722, 23355408 Fax: 011-23717250 AnnouncesKOLKATA (PHASE – III) HOUSING SCHEME(WBHIRA No. HIRA/P/SOU/2021/001183) ABOUT THE ORGANISATION: Central Government Employees Welfare Housing […]

CGHS : Empanelment of AYUSH Hospital/Centers under CGHS/CS (MA) Rules

February 21, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Empanelment of AYUSH Hospital/Centers under CGHS/CS (MA) Rules F.No.S. 110011/90/2016-CGHS (HEC)/AYUSH/Pt.II Government of India Ministry of Health& Family Welfare Directorate General of Central Government Health Scheme Nirman Bhavan , New Delhi Date: 12 February, 2021 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject:- Empanelment of AYUSH Hospital/Centers under CGHS/CS (MA) Rules. With reference to the above mentioned subject attention is […]

Finmin Order : Clarification on Cash Management Guidelines – Regarding

February 20, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Finmin Order : Clarification on Cash Management Guidelines – regarding F.No.12(13)-B(W&M)/2020 Ministry of FinanceDepartment of Economic Affairs(Budget Division) New Delhi,17th February, 2021. OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject: Clarification on Cash Management Guidelines – regarding. Clarifications have been sought regarding expenditure ceiling during last quarter and last month of 2020-21. It is clarified that the reference to this […]

CPAO : Documents to be submitted by family pensioner alongwith the formats

February 19, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

CPAO : Documents to be submitted by family pensioner alongwith the formats CPAO/Tech/Bank Performance/37 Vol-III(A)/2020-21/81 Dated: 12.022021 To, The Head of CPPC/GBD _______________________ ________________________ ________________________ Subject:- Documents to be submitted by family pensioner alongwith the formats. Sir/Madam, Your kind attention is invited to CCS Pension (Rules) 1981, Para 24 of the “Scheme for Payment of […]

CGEGIS : Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme-1980 – Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 01.01.2021 to 31.03.2021.

February 19, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme-1980 – Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 01.01.2021 to 31.03.2021. No. 7(2)/EV/2016 Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of Expenditure New Delhi, the 15th February, 2021 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub: Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme-1980 – Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the […]

Finmin Order : Clarification regarding queries being received in respect of Special Cash Package equivalent in lieu of Leave Travel Concession Fare for Central Government Employees during the block 2018-21.

February 18, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Finmin Order : Clarification regarding queries being received in respect of Special Cash Package equivalent in lieu of Leave Travel Concession Fare for Central Government Employees during the block 2018-21. No.12(2)/2020/E-II.A Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Expenditure North Block New Delhi Dated 16th February, 2020 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject: Clarification regarding queries being […]

Rajya Sabha Q&A : Methodology for Fixation of Basic Pay 

February 10, 2021 By selva Leave a Comment

Rajya Sabha Q&A : Methodology for Fixation of Basic Pay GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS (DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING) RAJYA SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 427 (TO BE ANSWERED ON 04.02.2021) METHODOLOGY FOR FIXATION OF BASIC PAY 427 SHRI NEERAJ SHEKHAR: Will the PRIME MINISTER be pleased to state: (a) […]

BPMS – Submission of Agenda Points for NC (JCM) and Standing Committee

February 10, 2021 By selva 1 Comment

BPMS – Submission of Agenda Points for NC (JCM) and Standing Committee No.: NCC/Aenda (4/1/L) Date: – 31/01/2021 To, Shri Shiva Gopal Mishra Secretary Naional Council Staff Side 13-C Feroz Shah Road New Delhi 11001 Subject: Submission of Agenda Points for NC (JCM) and Standing Committee. Reference: Your letter No. NC-JCM-2019, dated 11th January 2020 […]

More Posts from this Category

List of Holidays during the year 2021 for central government offices in Tripura

Regarding list of public and restricted holidays during the year 2021 for central government offices located in Tripura

Holiday list in the State of Haryana during the Calendar year 2021

Holiday list both public holidays and restricted holidays in the State of Haryana during the Calendar year 2021, dated December 3, 2020

Recent comments

  • Iavenkatakrishnan on Expected Dearness allowance [DA] from January 2021 Calculator
  • Satyendra on Pay Matrix Table For Rajasthan
  • Sudhir on Promotion/MACP Option form Calculator
  • javed on 5th pay commission fitment table
  • M.K.KUMAR on Finmin Order: LTC Special cash package during the Block 2018-21 : Important FAQ
  • Anonymous on LTC Leave Enhancement Calculator For Block Year 2018-2021
  • Dude on Finmin Order: LTC Special cash package during the Block 2018-21 : Important FAQ
  • Amit kumar sharma on Posting/transfer of defence civilian employees on compassionate grounds or on mutual basis
  • M.K.KUMAR on MACP DETAILS
  • DIWAN on Posting/transfer of defence civilian employees on compassionate grounds or on mutual basis

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pravin pramod deshpande says

    February 12, 2016 at 9:20 am

    My father retayerd sr shantar 1 5000-150-8000 BP 5300 on 31/10/2004, sir please calculection on pension including ranning allowence

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

calcuators

  • Expected DA Calculator January 2021
  • HRA calculator 2020 (DA>25%)
  • Tax benefit calculator 2020
  • Expected DA For Bank Employees From November 2020
  • 7th pay commission calculator [updated]
  • Promotion/MACP Option form Calculator
  • 7th Pay Commission Pension Calculator
  • Bonus Calculator 2020
  • LTC Leave Enhancement Calculator For Block Year 2018-2021
  • LTC cash voucher scheme Ready reckoner

Pay Matrix table

  • Defence Personnel
  • MNS Officers
  • Tamil nadu
  • Rajasthan
  • Odisha
  • Gujarat
  • Haryana
  • Jharkhand
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Nagaland
  • Tripura
  • Uttrakhand
  • Assam
  • Bihar

CSD Price list

  • CSD Car Price List 2021
  • Maruti Suzuki CSD Car Price List 2021

KVS Schools list

  • List of Kendriya Vidyalaya Schools
Copyright© 2010–2021

Central Government Employees News - Govtempdiary