MACP on Hierarchy: Pr. CAT directs to implement the judgement of High Court
Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) on Promotional Hierarchy: Hon’ble Principal Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), New Delhi directs Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development to implement the judgement of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Union of India & others v. Raj Pal & another (CWP No.19387/2011) decided on 19.10.2011 to the applicant within 4 weeks.
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench, New Delhi
O.A.No.2553/2013
Monday, this the 15th day of September, 2014
Hon ble Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Member (J)
Hon ble Mr. V.N. Gaur, Member (A)
1. All India CPWD Office Staff Association
Through its General Secretary
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
C Wing, Ground floor
Near Generator Room
IP Bhawan, New Delhi-2
2. Mr. Pradeep Singh Bist
Age 44 years
s/o Mr. K S Bist
r/o Flat No.167, Sector 5
R K Puram, New Delhi-22
3. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
Aged 48 years
s/o Mr. Chandra Bhan
r/o F-2887, Betaji Nagar
New Delhi-23
4. Mr. Pankaj Atri
Age 42 years
s/o late Mr. R C Sharma
r/o 165/16, Shivaji Nagar
Gurgaon (HR)
.. Applicant
(By Advocate: Mr. S K Gupta)
Versus
Union of India through
1. Secretary
Ministry of Urban Development
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
2. Director General
Central Public Works Department
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
..Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Rajinder Nischal)
O R D E R (ORAL)
Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj:
Learned counsels for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the present Original Application is, in all fours, of the decision of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Union of India & others v. Raj Pal & another (CWP No.19387/2011) decided on 19.10.2011.
2. In view of the aforementioned stand taken by the parties, the Original Application is disposed of with direction to the respondents to extend the benefit of the said judgment of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court to the applicants herein also within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs.
( V.N. Gaur ) ( A.K. Bhardwaj )
Member (A) Member (J)
15th September 2014
/sunil/
Source: http://judis.nic.in/judis_cat/Doj_Qry.aspx
courtesy-http://karnmk.blogspot.in/
C P MATHEW
MACP on departmental promotional heirarchy should have been implemented well before. Without implementing this natural justice is denied to those who suffer due to this . For example , I am an AA in Railways. As per the pay scales of VI th PC AA grade pay is Rs.4200/- and next promotional grade is SO(A) and their grade pay is Rs.4800/- . However, while granting MACP to AA’s Rs.4600/- was given as grade pay instead of Rs.4800/-. However, those who were appointed before 01.09.1984 and enjoyed IInd ACP were given Rs.4800/-. This is purely a double standard and discrimination and a big anomaly . Hope administration will understand this and grant departmental heirarchy while grantin MACP.